|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
INCIDENTAL LANDSCAPES
An entity is something that exists in itself, actually or hypothetically. It need not be of material existence. In particular, abstractions are usually regarded as entities. In general, there is also no presumption that an entity is animate. Each image has its visual form but beyond this form there is actual or hypothetical existence of knowledge, thoughts, imaginations and feelings generated when confronting the image.
My role is creating the image deliberately avoiding expression of my personal feelings and determined imaginations and expression of my thoughts. If it is a piece of reality as far as photographic image might be considered, it appears not so real since it does not meet our expectation, assumption and also possibly, conceals image manipulation.
Incidental Landscapes invokes illusory worlds that disrupt the boundaries between the real form of the land and fragments of someone's creative imagination, a document and a fiction. Art is intertwining the medium of painting and photography. The images transcend the usual depiction of the land leaving reality unreadable. Instead they bring forward dreams, hidden symbolism, sense of spirituality, emotions, stimulate intellectually.
Incidental Landscape embodies a notion of relation between individual and an image. The interest of somebody’s imagination and perception replaced fascination with the art-media and its scientific modelling in the previous works from late 70s and 80s.
Incidental Landscape is an event which does not communicate but becomes a communication itself.
Richard Tabaka
© COPYRIGHTS RESPECTIVE ARTISTS,CURATOR, AND AUTHORS OF PUBLISHED ARTICLES